The Wyoming Supreme Court declined Tuesday to intervene in a Cheyenne lawyer’s dispute with the Wyoming Attorney General’s Office over its handling of an election complaint against Secretary of State Chuck Gray. 

In April, George Powers, a private attorney, filed an election code complaint with Attorney General Keith Kautz. In the complaint, Powers alleged that Gray may have broken state law when, in August, he gave the driver’s license numbers and partial Social Security numbers of every registered voter to the U.S. Department of Justice. The Trump administration began seeking that information from all 50 states in 2025. 

Because Kautz had advised Gray in his response to the Justice Department request, Powers asked the attorney general to recuse himself from the matter. When Kautz would not say whether he would do so, Powers asked the Supreme Court to intervene. 

More specifically, Powers’ attorneys filed a petition for a writ of mandamus — a legal action that allows a court to order government officials to perform their public duties. Because it is considered an extraordinary remedy, courts will only grant such a petition if it meets certain requirements, including a clear right to relief, a defined duty to act and the absence of any other legal recourse in the matter. 

The petition asked the high court to command Kautz, himself a former Wyoming Supreme Court justice, to recuse himself and his office from investigating the allegations contained in the complaint, and to appoint an independent prosecutor to handle the matter. 

Tuesday, the high court denied the petition. 

“We find Petitioner has not cited any ‘absolute, clear, and indisputable’ law specifically requiring these actions,” the two-page decision states. “As such, Petitioner is not entitled to mandamus relief.”

The ruling spells the petition’s end, but does not necessarily conclude the dispute. Ryan Semerad, attorney for Powers, told WyoFile they are considering next steps, especially since the petition process provided both “more information and more questions.”

In his response to the petition, which was filed earlier this month, Kautz disclosed publicly for the first time that two groups of attorneys who reviewed Powers’ complaint declined to bring criminal charges against Gray. 

The attorney general’s office evaluated the complaint by creating a “Chinese wall,” or an internal information barrier, the filing states. An unnamed private Wyoming law firm, alongside a Wyoming county and prosecuting attorney, conducted the second evaluation. 

Both groups of attorneys decided not to pursue criminal charges, the filing states. 

Kautz’s office has not responded to inquiries by WyoFile about the identities of the law firm or the county and prosecuting attorney. 

Gray has stood by his decision, maintaining he made it in consultation with the attorney general’s office and in support of election integrity. He has accused Powers of trying to undermine his office’s work. 

“From the very beginning, this has been nothing more than a political witch hunt from Leftist George Powers and an attempt by the Left and the media to damage my Congressional campaign,” Gray said in a text message, adding that “over 20 states” have complied with the Justice Department. 

Most states have responded to the request by either providing publicly available versions of their voter registration lists — i.e. data sets without sensitive information — or altogether declining to provide lists, according to the Brennan Center, which has been tracking states’ responses.

This is a breaking news story and may be updated.

Maggie Mullen reports on state government and politics. Before joining WyoFile in 2022, she spent five years at Wyoming Public Radio.

Leave a comment

WyoFile's goal is to provide readers with information and ideas that foster constructive conversations about the issues and opportunities our communities face. One small piece of how we do that is by offering a space below each story for readers to share perspectives, experiences and insights. For this to work, we need your help.

What we're looking for: 

  • Your real name — first and last. 
  • Direct responses to the article. Tell us how your experience relates to the story.
  • The truth. Share factual information that adds context to the reporting.
  • Thoughtful answers to questions raised by the reporting or other commenters.
  • Tips that could advance our reporting on the topic.
  • No more than three comments per story, including replies. 

What we block from our comments section, when we see it:

  • Pseudonyms. WyoFile stands behind everything we publish, and we expect commenters to do the same by using their real name.
  • Comments that are not directly relevant to the article. 
  • Demonstrably false claims, what-about-isms, references to debunked lines of rhetoric, professional political talking points or links to sites trafficking in misinformation.
  • Personal attacks, profanity, discriminatory language or threats.
  • Arguments with other commenters.

Other important things to know: 

  • Appearing in WyoFile’s comments section is a privilege, not a right or entitlement. 
  • We’re a small team and our first priority is reporting. Depending on what’s going on, comments may be moderated 24 to 48 hours from when they’re submitted — or even later. If you comment in the evening or on the weekend, please be patient. We’ll get to it when we’re back in the office.
  • We’re not interested in managing squeaky wheels, and even if we wanted to, we don't have time to address every single commenter’s grievance. 
  • Try as we might, we will make mistakes. We’ll fail to catch aliases, mistakenly allow folks to exceed the comment limit and occasionally miss false statements. If that’s going to upset you, it’s probably best to just stick with our journalism and avoid the comments section.
  • We don’t mediate disputes between commenters. If you have concerns about another commenter, please don’t bring them to us.

The bottom line:

If you repeatedly push the boundaries, make unreasonable demands, get caught lying or generally cause trouble, we will stop approving your comments — maybe forever. Such moderation decisions are not negotiable or subject to explanation. If civil and constructive conversation is not your goal, then our comments section is not for you. 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *